Which event ends the court's jurisdiction over a person entering such program under Subsection F?

• A. Completion of the program
• B. Either successful completion or revocation, whichever occurs first
• C. Revocation due to ineligibility or violation
• D. The case being transferred to another jurisdiction

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that the court’s authority is tied to the person’s participation in the program, and it ends when that program ends. In this framework, the court’s jurisdiction stops at whichever event happens first: if the person completes the program successfully, the program ends and so does the court’s supervision; if the program is revoked for ineligibility or violation, that ends the program and the court’s jurisdiction at that time. The important nuance is that either outcome can terminate jurisdiction, so the ending is not limited to completion alone or to revocation alone. Transferring the case to another jurisdiction isn’t the trigger for ending jurisdiction under this rule.