What does Code § 19.2-303.1 allow?

• A. Imposes imprisonment for all DUI offenses.
• B. Allows suspension of the imposition or execution of a sentence for up to the statutory maximum period for participation in a court-ordered program.
• C. Requires automatic imprisonment if the program is not completed.
• D. Eliminates court-ordered alcohol safety programs.

Answer: (B)

The main idea being tested is that this statute gives the court a rehabilitative option for certain offenses: it can suspend the imposition or execution of a sentence while the defendant participates in a court-ordered program, for a period no longer than the offense’s maximum penalty. This creates an incentive to complete treatment or a related program, with the potential that, if the program is successfully completed, the punishment is effectively deferred or avoided.

This is the best choice because it accurately describes the procedural tool: conditional leniency tied to program participation, capped by the statutory maximum. It emphasizes that the action is about suspending what would otherwise be imposed, rather than mandating imprisonment or eliminating programs.

The other statements don’t fit. Imprisonment for all DUI offenses isn’t what this provision requires. Automatic imprisonment if the program isn’t completed isn’t stated—rather, the court can impose the sentence up to the maximum if the program isn’t completed. And eliminating court-ordered alcohol safety or similar programs is contrary to the concept of offering a program-based suspension as an option.