In administrative cases, an offender no longer under court jurisdiction may enroll in any ASAP of their choice provided they are not petitioning for a restricted driver's license.

• A. If under court jurisdiction, must enroll in adjacent ASAP.
• B. Offenders no longer under court jurisdiction may enroll in any ASAP of their choice provided they are not petitioning for a restricted driver's license.
• C. They must always enroll in the original court's ASAP.
• D. They cannot enroll without petition.

Answer: (B)

When a case moves into an administrative phase, the person is treated more flexibly in terms of program enrollment. The key idea is that the offender is allowed to choose any ASAP they want, rather than being locked into the court’s assigned program, as long as they’re not petitioning for a restricted driver's license. That conditional detail matters: if they are petitioning for an RDL, the usual flexibility may not apply, so the choice of program isn’t the same. This explanation aligns with the option stating you may enroll in any ASAP of your choice provided you’re not petitioning for a restricted driver's license. The other scenarios imply restrictions that aren’t part of this rule (for example, that you must stay with the original court’s program, or that you need a petition to enroll), which isn’t consistent with the stated administrative-case policy.