DUI 2nd and Subsequent case reviews are permissible only if the court has order an extended period of ASAP supervision. Which option best reflects this rule?

• A. In all DUI 2nd and Subsequent cases
• B. Only when the court orders an extended period of ASAP supervision
• C. Only if the defendant pays a fee
• D. When the interlock is not required

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that reviewing DUI 2nd and subsequent cases is allowed only when the court has ordered an extended period of ASAP supervision. That condition ties the review to the defendant’s level of supervision, ensuring there’s enough structured oversight before a case is reviewed. The option that states reviews are permissible only when the court orders an extended period of ASAP supervision matches this requirement exactly, making it the correct choice. The other options don’t fit: applying reviews to all DUI 2nd+ cases ignores the need for extended supervision; requiring a fee isn’t part of the rule; and interlock status isn’t relevant to whether ASAP supervision is extended.